JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC.

for Japanese

ATOMS in JAPAN

21 May, 2015

NRA Confirms Compatibility of Ikata-3’s Basic Safety Design with New Rules

On May 20, Japan's Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) completed a draft of a review report concluding that the Ikata-3 Nuclear Power Plant (PWR, 890MWe), owned and operated by the Shikoku Electric Power Co. in Ikata Town, Ehime Prefecture, complies with the new regulatory standards.

Ikata NPPs

The NRA will next finalize the report after referring it to the Japan Atomic Energy Commission (JAEC) and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) for their opinions, as required by law. It will also make the draft report available to the public for one month in order to get comments.

Ikata-3 is the fifth reactor for which the NRA has prepared a draft review report, following Sendai-1 and -2, owned and operated by the Kyushu Electric Power Co., and the Takahama-3 and -4, owned and operated by the Kansai Electric Power Co. The basic design of those four has already been authorized, with permission granted to their operators to change reactor installations accordingly.

After the draft report is released, the NRA will release it to the public for one month for scientific and technical comments, as mentioned above, after which it will finalize the review report. Ikata-3 is expected to officially clear the examination this summer.

After that, consent is required from both the prefecture and local municipalities before the reactor can be restarted, as well as official approval of the construction plans for the detailed designs of facilities and equipment. Any revisions to the operational safety program providing rules for operating the reactor must also be officially approved.

At the Ikata-3 site, work on safety measures is currently underway. Given the above timetable, the reactor will probably be restarted by winter this year, at the earliest.

Shikoku Electric Power had submitted its application for confirmation of the reactor’s compatibility on July 8, 2013, the very day that the new regulatory standards originally came into effect. Since then, some 76 meetings have been held as part of the examination.

More than a year of that time was spent discussing the effects of a long, large fault known as the “Japan Median Tectonic Line,” which runs about 8km offshore from the Ikata site. The power company raised the estimated ground motion in its calculations to 650gal from the initial 570gal.

As a consequence of that change, the seismic resistance of the main anti-earthquake building, where an accident response headquarters would be established, was determined to be insufficient, so a new emergency response site had to be established.

Last month, Shikoku Electric Power submitted an amendment to its application for the examination of the reactor, based on several issues pointed out by the NRA during the examination meetings.

After the NRA completed its draft review report for Ikata-3, Governor Tokihiro Nakamura of Ehime Prefecture released a comment noting that the examination had proceeded to its final stage, and that the prefecture would confirm the reactor’s safety through its own expert committee.

Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map

Video

“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, Jan. 2020)

23 January, 2020
“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, Jan. 2020)07:47

Recent News

29 January, 2020
JAIF President Takahashi Gives Press Briefing, Describing Court Order Halting the Operation of Ikata-3 as “Regrettable”
23 January, 2020
Finishing Mission in Japan, IAEA’s IRRS Points Out Importance of NRA’s Communicating with Nuclear Industry
21 January, 2020
Evacuation Orders for Futaba, Okuma, Tomioka Towns to Be Partially Lifted in March, with JR Joban Line to Be Completely Reopened for Service
16 January, 2020
Japan’s Nuclear Power Plant Capacity Factor Stood at Just 21.4 Percent Last Year
26 December, 2019
IEEJ’s Supply-Demand Outlook for FY2020 Looks at Effect of Specific Safety Facility Installation Deadlines
25 December, 2019
ANRE Committee Clarifies Options for Treated Contaminated Water at Fukushima Daiichi NPPs, Viewing Both Offshore and Vapor Release Favorably
24 December, 2019
Fuel Removal from Fukushima Daiichi-1 NPP: Large Cover to be Installed First
18 December, 2019
JAEC Begins Hearing from University Personnel on Human Resource Development, Starting with Nagoya and Osaka Universities
13 December, 2019
NRA Approves Decommissioning Plans for Kansai EP’s Ohi-1 and-2
12 December, 2019
JAEA Holds International Forum on Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Nuclear Security
▲TOP