JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC.

for Japanese

ATOMS in JAPAN

9 November, 2017

UNSCEAR White Paper Reiterates Findings that Fukushima Risks Are Low

On October 27, Secretary Malcolm Crick of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) paid a courtesy visit to Japanese Parliamentary Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs Manabu Horii, personally delivering his organization's 2017 white paper on the health risks stemming from radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident following the giant March 2011 earthquake and tsunami. The report was a follow-up to a similar report released in 2013, describing subsequent developments.

Katsurao Village in October 2017

Commenting on the 2013 UNSCEAR report and follow-up activities, the vice-minister said that he valued them as neutral scientific evaluations by a UN organization. Two days later, on October 29, presentations were staged on both the 2013 report and the white paper at Iwaki City in Fukushima Prefecture.

Published by UNSCEAR in April 2014, the 2013 report stated that there was no need in Fukushima to expect significant occurrences of radiation-induced thyroid cancer, as had been observed in the wake of the Chernobyl nuclear accident. It also predicted that there would not be any increased incidence of breast cancer, childhood leukemia and other types of cancer in children to the identification level, and that the most serious and noticeable effects of the accident in the short term would be on mental health and social well-being. UNSCEAR has carried out follow-up activities since it released the 2013 report.

In its recent white paper, UNSCEAR identified further information available through the end of 2016, and systematically determined its effects on the 2013 report. It concluded that no such information substantially affects the main findings of the 2013 report or challenges its major assumptions; rather, much of the new information confirmed those assumptions and findings.

Based on its reviews, UNSCEAR found no need, as of now, to make changes to the evaluations and conclusions of the 2013 report. Regarding several documents and literature, however, it said that more certain evidence must still be obtained through further analyses and additional studies.

Referring to a paper, released in 2016, claiming that crisis rates for thyroid cancer among minors (aged seventeen or less) were twenty to fifty times higher in Fukushima than the Japanese national average, the UNSCEAR white paper pointed out serious flaws, citing excessive bias in its planning and methodology, including insufficient consideration given to the effects of using highly-sensitive ultrasonic inspection devices.

It also noted overdiagnosis from highly-sensitive thyroid examinations using ultrasonic waves, as well as concerns about active treatment of minor thyroid cancers, adding that thyroid screening was a complicated issue. It also mentioned factors going beyond genuine scientific questions when determining the scope, nature and continuation of screening after the Fukushima Daiichi accident: namely, matters related to socioeconomic issues, public health, law, morality and human rights.

Elsewhere, at the 28th meeting of the study committee for the Fukushima Health Management Survey held on October 23, Hajime Suzuki, clinic director at the International University of Health and Welfare, reported that the average thyroid equivalent dose from external and internal radiation exposure for one-year-old infants in the prefecture had been reevaluated to incorporate new information. He said that results were obtained of less than 40mSv in all areas, which is within seven to sixty-nine percent, as stated in the UNSCEAR 2013 report.

The committee will continue to work to reduce uncertainties in data, and will reevaluate doses again in FY18 (April 2018 to March 2019).

Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map

Video

“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, July 2019)

8 July, 2019
“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, July 2019)09:17

Recent News

23 January, 2020
Finishing Mission in Japan, IAEA’s IRRS Points Out Importance of NRA’s Communicating with Nuclear Industry
21 January, 2020
Evacuation Orders for Futaba, Okuma, Tomioka Towns to Be Partially Lifted in March, with JR Joban Line to Be Completely Reopened for Service
16 January, 2020
Japan’s Nuclear Power Plant Capacity Factor Stood at Just 21.4 Percent Last Year
26 December, 2019
IEEJ’s Supply-Demand Outlook for FY2020 Looks at Effect of Specific Safety Facility Installation Deadlines
25 December, 2019
ANRE Committee Clarifies Options for Treated Contaminated Water at Fukushima Daiichi NPPs, Viewing Both Offshore and Vapor Release Favorably
24 December, 2019
Fuel Removal from Fukushima Daiichi-1 NPP: Large Cover to be Installed First
18 December, 2019
JAEC Begins Hearing from University Personnel on Human Resource Development, Starting with Nagoya and Osaka Universities
13 December, 2019
NRA Approves Decommissioning Plans for Kansai EP’s Ohi-1 and-2
12 December, 2019
JAEA Holds International Forum on Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Nuclear Security
29 November, 2019
NRA Issues Draft Review Report: Onagawa-2 Meets New Regulatory Standards
▲TOP