JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC.

for Japanese

ATOMS in JAPAN

9 March, 2016

Committee Compares Personnel at FBR Monju and ATR Fugen, Pointing Out Differences in Years of Experience

On March 4, the fourth meeting was held of a study committee under Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) that is considering the state and future of the prototype fast breeder reactor (FBR) Monju, owned and operated by the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA). There, they primarily discussed differences in the treatment of personnel at Monju with those of the advanced thermal reactor (ATR) Fugen, also developed and operated by the same agency.

ATR Fugen

The advantage of an ATR is its ability to use diverse types of fuel assemblies. For example, not only can it burn enriched uranium, as do ordinary light water reactors (LWRs), but can also burn natural uranium as well. In that sense, although the structure of the prototype test reactor Fugen is similar to that of boiling water reactors (BWRs), it is characterized by the use of heavy water as the moderator to create conditions for nuclear fission by natural uranium.

Since it began generating electricity in 1978 until the end of its service in 2003, Fugen produced a total of 21.924TWh of electricity. It burned 772 uranium-plutonium mixed oxide (MOX) fuel assemblies in that process—the most in the world—and contributed significantly to establishing technology for the use of plutonium. Fugen served without any serious problems.

According to an explanation made by JAEA representatives at the March 4 meeting, the organization cooperated with the respective manufacturers of Monju and Fugen in similar ways, but there was also an important difference. Namely, at Fugen, proper full-time employees hired before the commissioning remained engaged in operations until the end.

That is, many staff members with valuable on-site experience were always working at the site at Fugen, especially those in the maintenance sector. When Fugen ceased operating in FY02, about 75% of workers there had more than 20 years of experience. In contrast, the current percentage of such personnel at Monju is only about 20%.

Following the explanation, committee members raised various personnel-related questions. Chairman Akio Takahashi of the Japan Atomic Industrial Forum (JAIF), for instance, asked about career paths for managers at Monju.

At future meetings with JAEA, the study committee is expected to inquire about component ratios of managerial and technical staff, as well as such matters as the knowledge required of full-time employees.

Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map

Video

Voices from Nuclear Industry – Contributing to a clean and resilient recovery

3 September, 2020
Voices from Nuclear Industry – Contributing to a clean and resilient recovery03:59

Recent News

3 December, 2020
MHI Launches New Strategy to Achieve Carbon Neutrality by 2050
26 November, 2020
JAIF Releases Results of Fact-finding Survey of Japanese Nuclear Industry for Fiscal 2019: Some Effects Seen of COVID-19
24 November, 2020
Japan’s Energy Supply and Demand in Fiscal 2019 Shows CO2 Emissions Down for Sixth Year in a Row
24 November, 2020
NUMO Accepts Applications from Two Municipalities to Conduct Literature Surveys, Moving Closer Toward Selecting HLW Final Disposal Site
16 November, 2020
Kyushu Electric Power Starts Operating Facilities at Sendai-1 NPP Designed for “Specific Severe Accident” Response—First Time in Japan
13 November, 2020
Japan’s NRA Approves Changes to Mutsu Recyclable-Fuel Storage Center after Confirming Regulatory Compliance
13 November, 2020
Keidanren Announces New Growth Strategy Supporting Advanced Reactor Development
29 October, 2020
New Prime Minister Suga Enthusiastic for Carbon-Free Society by 2050
16 October, 2020
Government’s Strategic Policy Committee Starts Deliberations toward Revision of Strategic Energy Plan
13 October, 2020
NUMO Accepts Suttsu’s Application for Literature Survey in Selecting HLW Final Disposal Site—First Since Release of Map of Scientific Features
▲TOP