JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC.

for Japanese

ATOMS in JAPAN

4 July, 2018

Court of Second Instance Approves Operation of Ohi NPPs

In a lawsuit brought by an anti-nuclear group demanding that the Kansai Electric Power Co. (Kansai EP) halt operation of its Ohi-3 and -4 Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) in Ohi Town, Fukui Prefecture, the Kanazawa Branch (Presiding Judge Masayuki Naito) of the Nagoya High Court on July 4 reversed the order of the Fukui District Court, which had found for the original plaintiff and prohibited operation – ruling on appeal against the anti-nuclear group.

Ohi NPPs

Since issuance of new regulatory standards in the wake of the accident at Fukushima Daiichi NPPs, anti-nuclear groups have been coordinating their efforts and acting strategically. Across the country they filed numerous lawsuits and requests for temporary injunctions prohibiting the restarting of NPPs. Because some district court (first instance) judgments were rendered against restarts, a ruling this time at the level of a high court was a matter of great interest.

In the lower court decision on the Ohi NPPs rendered in May 2014, a halt was ordered to NPP operations on the basis of there being “specific risks of losing cooling capability for the reactors in an earthquake and leakage of radioactive substances from spent nuclear fuel.” In an earlier appeal hearing before finalization, however, whether or not the prediction of standard ground motion (Ss) – a factor in seismic design – had been appropriate was the major point of contention.

The plaintiff argued that Kansai EP’s method of prediction of standard ground motion (Ss) was inappropriate and the risk was underestimated. Insisting that its method had been appropriate, Kansai EP said it had used the most severe assumptions based on a geological survey and had “confirmed that safety capability could be maintained.”

The Ohi-3 and -4 NPPs were restarted one at a time beginning last March. Kansai EP reduced its power rates in July using funds generated from reduced fuel costs as a result of the NPP restarts and more.

Historically, unless an “order of injunction“ is confirmed by the Supreme Court, operation of NPPs remains possible. Anti-nuclear groups have thus become more procedurally clever, preferring to employ the weight of a “provisional disposition” whereby operation of NPPs is halted at the moment a court decision is made.

Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map

Video

TEPCO Makes Contact with Debris at Fukushima Daiichi-2

15 February, 2019
TEPCO Makes Contact with Debris at Fukushima Daiichi-206:54

Recent News

15 February, 2019
TEPCO Makes Contact with Debris at Fukushima Daiichi-2
12 February, 2019
Kansai EP Reviews and Pushes Back Completion Dates for Safety Improvement Work at Three NPPs Granted Extended Lifetimes
12 February, 2019
Dismantling of Exhaust Stack at Fukushima Daiichi-1 and -2 to Start in May
4 February, 2019
Overview of Fact-Finding Survey of the Japanese Nuclear Industry 2017 (through March 2018)
1 February, 2019
JAEA Achieves 150 Hours of Continuous Hydrogen Production Toward Utilization of Heat from HTGRs
30 January, 2019
JAIF President Takahashi Regrets Freezing of Japanese Nuclear Power Project in the UK
30 January, 2019
In Anticipation of Next Year’s Olympics, Reception Held to Expand Sales of Fukushima Products
24 January, 2019
Hitachi President Alarmed about Future Human Resources as Company Freezes Project in Britain
11 January, 2019
At New Year’s Party, JAIF Chairman Imai Stresses Necessity of Securing and Fostering Nuclear Human Resources
11 January, 2019
Outlook for Energy Supply and Demand for Japan in Fiscal 2019 Sees Slower Adoption of Non-fossil Power Sources
▲TOP