for Japanese

25 February, 2016

Examinations of Fault Zones of Crushed Rock at Nuclear Sites

The results of investigations have been released of faults lying within the site of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plants, owned and operated by the Tokyo Electric Power Co. Also, the standard ground motion (Ss) has been determined for the Tomari-3 NPP, owned and operated by the Hokkaido Electric Power Co.

JAIF President Takahashi

Both announcements show that steady progress is being made in examinations of nuclear power plants to confirm their compatibility with the new regulatory standards.

Meanwhile, Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) has discussed, via an expert panel, six sites where the former Nuclear & Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) had ordered additional investigations of fault zones of crushed rock beneath station premises. More than one of the operators had objected to the NRA about those investigations.

That indicates that discussions are not proceeding in a manner satisfactory to both parties. Given such a situation, I want to express my hope for two points in future discussions:

1. Creating outcomes that will be satisfactory to both the NRA and nuclear operators—achievable through more thorough discussions.

At a meeting held in December 2014, the NRA announced its policy of carrying out strict examinations of NPPs for compatibility with new regulatory standards—for which applications were being filed—adding that it would refer not just to evaluations made by the panel of experts, but also to the latest knowledge and information obtained by the operators in their additional investigations and other activities.

Regarding the Tsuruga-2, owned and operated by the Japan Atomic Power Company (JAPC), the panel of experts concluded, in its draft evaluation report, that one of the fault zones of crushed rock running directly under the reactor building could possibly become an active fault in the future.

At an evaluation meeting held this month, after JAPC had filed an application for a compatibility examination for Unit 2 in November 2015, the NRA secretariat presented 13 points to be addressed (nine of which are related to ground characteristics and earthquakes, including a fault zone of crushed rock within the site) when conducting the compatibility examination. It is expected that discussions in future evaluation meetings will intensify in accordance with the NRA’s policy and the 13 points mentioned above.

As for the Shika NPPs, owned and operated by the Hokuriku Electric Power Co. the expert panel will issue a draft evaluation report in due course. At a peer review meeting that has already been held, reviewers made comments and expressed views that could be interpreted as objections to the evaluation. In order to be of help in compatibility examinations from now on, it is important that such views and comments by the reviewers be reflected in the final evaluation report.

The NRA and operators are urged to further improve their communications during safety examinations, and to endeavor to discuss matters in a way that each is satisfied with the outcome, in both its scientific and technological aspects.

2. Making explanations in a way that the public finds easy to understand.

Of the many safety issues to be dealt with, questions about geologic faults and crushed rock zones generate a lot of concern among the general public, but the answers are actually difficult and require a professional level of understanding.

People need to understand nuclear safety-related activities if they are to feel a sense of ease about nuclear power. Both the operators and the NRA must thus explain matters to the public in an easy-to-understand manner: not just to people living in local siting areas, but also to the nation as a whole. Besides explaining the results of examinations, moreover, they must also clarify, both transparently and fairly, how they were conducted.

Akio Takahashi, President, JAIF


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map


Grossi on Fukushima: Marking a Decade Since the Accident

10 March, 2021
Grossi on Fukushima: Marking a Decade Since the Accident04:11

Recent News

17 September, 2021
NRA Permits Shimane-2 under New Regulatory Standards
14 September, 2021
IAEA Deputy Director General Evrard Visits Japan in Advance of Safety Review of ALPS-treated Water
1 September, 2021
Evaluation Report Issued by IAEA’s Review Mission to Fukushima Daiichi: First Visit since 2018
24 August, 2021
METI and IAEA Agree on Further Review Missions to Fukushima Daiichi
4 August, 2021
JAEA Restarts High-Temperature Engineering Test Reactor “HTTR”
2 August, 2021
Information about Fukushima Daiichi NPS Water Treatment
28 July, 2021
METI’s Committee Shows Rough Draft of Next Strategic Energy Plan
2 July, 2021
Mihama-3 Restarted After Decade-long Hiatus: First Restart in Japan of a Reactor Operating Beyond 40 Years
28 June, 2021
Mihama-3 Restarts after Decade-long Hiatus
25 June, 2021
New Canada-Japan Partnership Supports Greater Collaboration to Meet Climate Change Objectives and Net-zero Goals
24 June, 2021
METI Issues New Green Growth Strategy Through Achieving Carbon Neutrality
16 June, 2021
ANRE Sticks to “S+3E”
16 June, 2021
Japanese Cabinet Approves Environmental White Paper 2021
16 June, 2021
LDP Parliamentary Association to Reconfirm Position on Utilization of Nuclear Power
16 June, 2021
Fukui Governor Concerned about Deletion of Reference to “Maximum Utilization” of Nuclear Power
14 June, 2021
Working Group on Offshore Release of Treated Water Meets in Miyagi
14 June, 2021
NRA Considers Policy on Treating Slurry from ALPS, with Local Understanding Essential
11 June, 2021
Japanese Cabinet Approves Energy White Paper 2021
11 June, 2021
Government Omits Description of “Maximum Utilization” of Nuclear Power
9 June, 2021
MNF Hopes to Resume Fuel Production as Early as November