for Japanese

25 February, 2016

Examinations of Fault Zones of Crushed Rock at Nuclear Sites

The results of investigations have been released of faults lying within the site of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plants, owned and operated by the Tokyo Electric Power Co. Also, the standard ground motion (Ss) has been determined for the Tomari-3 NPP, owned and operated by the Hokkaido Electric Power Co.

JAIF President Takahashi

Both announcements show that steady progress is being made in examinations of nuclear power plants to confirm their compatibility with the new regulatory standards.

Meanwhile, Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) has discussed, via an expert panel, six sites where the former Nuclear & Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) had ordered additional investigations of fault zones of crushed rock beneath station premises. More than one of the operators had objected to the NRA about those investigations.

That indicates that discussions are not proceeding in a manner satisfactory to both parties. Given such a situation, I want to express my hope for two points in future discussions:

1. Creating outcomes that will be satisfactory to both the NRA and nuclear operators—achievable through more thorough discussions.

At a meeting held in December 2014, the NRA announced its policy of carrying out strict examinations of NPPs for compatibility with new regulatory standards—for which applications were being filed—adding that it would refer not just to evaluations made by the panel of experts, but also to the latest knowledge and information obtained by the operators in their additional investigations and other activities.

Regarding the Tsuruga-2, owned and operated by the Japan Atomic Power Company (JAPC), the panel of experts concluded, in its draft evaluation report, that one of the fault zones of crushed rock running directly under the reactor building could possibly become an active fault in the future.

At an evaluation meeting held this month, after JAPC had filed an application for a compatibility examination for Unit 2 in November 2015, the NRA secretariat presented 13 points to be addressed (nine of which are related to ground characteristics and earthquakes, including a fault zone of crushed rock within the site) when conducting the compatibility examination. It is expected that discussions in future evaluation meetings will intensify in accordance with the NRA’s policy and the 13 points mentioned above.

As for the Shika NPPs, owned and operated by the Hokuriku Electric Power Co. the expert panel will issue a draft evaluation report in due course. At a peer review meeting that has already been held, reviewers made comments and expressed views that could be interpreted as objections to the evaluation. In order to be of help in compatibility examinations from now on, it is important that such views and comments by the reviewers be reflected in the final evaluation report.

The NRA and operators are urged to further improve their communications during safety examinations, and to endeavor to discuss matters in a way that each is satisfied with the outcome, in both its scientific and technological aspects.

2. Making explanations in a way that the public finds easy to understand.

Of the many safety issues to be dealt with, questions about geologic faults and crushed rock zones generate a lot of concern among the general public, but the answers are actually difficult and require a professional level of understanding.

People need to understand nuclear safety-related activities if they are to feel a sense of ease about nuclear power. Both the operators and the NRA must thus explain matters to the public in an easy-to-understand manner: not just to people living in local siting areas, but also to the nation as a whole. Besides explaining the results of examinations, moreover, they must also clarify, both transparently and fairly, how they were conducted.

Akio Takahashi, President, JAIF


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map


“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, July 2019)

8 July, 2019
“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, July 2019)09:17

Recent News

21 January, 2020
Evacuation Orders for Futaba, Okuma, Tomioka Towns to Be Partially Lifted in March, with JR Joban Line to Be Completely Reopened for Service
16 January, 2020
Japan’s Nuclear Power Plant Capacity Factor Stood at Just 21.4 Percent Last Year
26 December, 2019
IEEJ’s Supply-Demand Outlook for FY2020 Looks at Effect of Specific Safety Facility Installation Deadlines
25 December, 2019
ANRE Committee Clarifies Options for Treated Contaminated Water at Fukushima Daiichi NPPs, Viewing Both Offshore and Vapor Release Favorably
24 December, 2019
Fuel Removal from Fukushima Daiichi-1 NPP: Large Cover to be Installed First
18 December, 2019
JAEC Begins Hearing from University Personnel on Human Resource Development, Starting with Nagoya and Osaka Universities
13 December, 2019
NRA Approves Decommissioning Plans for Kansai EP’s Ohi-1 and-2
12 December, 2019
JAEA Holds International Forum on Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Nuclear Security
29 November, 2019
NRA Issues Draft Review Report: Onagawa-2 Meets New Regulatory Standards
28 November, 2019
RIKEN Unveils Transportable Compact Neutron Source System