JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC.

for Japanese

ATOMS in JAPAN

26 December, 2019

IEEJ’s Supply-Demand Outlook for FY2020 Looks at Effect of Specific Safety Facility Installation Deadlines

On December 23, 2019, the Institute of Energy Economics, Japan (IEEJ) released a report entitled “Economic and Energy Outlook of Japan for FY2020,” referring to the fiscal year beginning on April 1, 2020.

According to the report, Japan’s domestic primary energy supply is expected to decline year-on-year by 0.4 percent in both the current fiscal year 2019 (ended March 31, 2020) and the coming fiscal year 2020, due to reduced production in manufacturing and progress in energy conservation, while economic activities should expand modestly.

Looking specifically at nuclear power, no nuclear power plants (NPPs) were restarted in FY19, with domestic energy supply put at 61TWh, down 1.8 percent. In FY20, although four NPPs are expected to be restarted, three will be suspended, because facilities for responding to specific severe accidents—termed “specific safety facilities” (i.e., anti-terrorism measures)—will not be completed by their installation deadlines. Energy supply is expected to expand year-on-year in the coming fiscal year by 4.1 percent, to 63.5TWh.

As for coal, its use in Japan has been flat recently, but will rebound to a 2.4-percent year-on-year growth in FY20, given the construction of additional coal-fired thermal generation plants starting in the latter half of FY19. The report shows expected declines in oil and natural gas at almost the same rate until FY20.

Currently compatibility examinations for twelve NPPs (including those under construction) are being carried out by the Nuclear Regulation Authority of Japan (NRA). The deadline for completion of specific safety facilities will come in March 2020 for Sendai-1, the first of two units at the facility owned and operated by the Kyushu Electric Power Co. The deadline for Sendai-2 is two months later, in May.

The report also includes a scenario wherein no NPPs would be suspended due to the incompletion of specific safety facilities. In that case, in contrast to the basic scenario, fossil fuel imports would decline by JPY60 billion (USD550 million at USD1=JPY109), energy self-sufficiency would improve by 0.5 percent, and CO2 emissions would be reduced by 3 million tons.

Given that more NPPs will be facing the same deadlines in and after FY20, the report notes that the “smooth restart of NPPs through functional safety examinations is important for Japan to achieve the 3 E’s (economic efficiency, energy security, and environmental protection).”

In an IEEJ report on prospects for nuclear power and related issues, Tomoko Murakami, group manager of IEEJ’s Nuclear Energy Group, says that for the nine NPPs that restarted already, it took an average of a year and five months for restarts to take place from the time of approval of compatibility under the new regulatory standards.

She added that attention should be paid in FY20 and thereafter to such lead times for restarting, as well as regarding applications for extensions of NPP operating lives.

Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map

Video

Grossi on Fukushima: Marking a Decade Since the Accident

10 March, 2021
Grossi on Fukushima: Marking a Decade Since the Accident04:11

Recent News

4 August, 2021
JAEA Restarts High-Temperature Engineering Test Reactor “HTTR”
2 August, 2021
Information about Fukushima Daiichi NPS Water Treatment
28 July, 2021
METI’s Committee Shows Rough Draft of Next Strategic Energy Plan
2 July, 2021
Mihama-3 Restarted After Decade-long Hiatus: First Restart in Japan of a Reactor Operating Beyond 40 Years
28 June, 2021
Mihama-3 Restarts after Decade-long Hiatus
25 June, 2021
New Canada-Japan Partnership Supports Greater Collaboration to Meet Climate Change Objectives and Net-zero Goals
24 June, 2021
METI Issues New Green Growth Strategy Through Achieving Carbon Neutrality
16 June, 2021
ANRE Sticks to “S+3E”
16 June, 2021
Japanese Cabinet Approves Environmental White Paper 2021
16 June, 2021
LDP Parliamentary Association to Reconfirm Position on Utilization of Nuclear Power
16 June, 2021
Fukui Governor Concerned about Deletion of Reference to “Maximum Utilization” of Nuclear Power
14 June, 2021
Working Group on Offshore Release of Treated Water Meets in Miyagi
14 June, 2021
NRA Considers Policy on Treating Slurry from ALPS, with Local Understanding Essential
11 June, 2021
Japanese Cabinet Approves Energy White Paper 2021
11 June, 2021
Government Omits Description of “Maximum Utilization” of Nuclear Power
9 June, 2021
MNF Hopes to Resume Fuel Production as Early as November
8 June, 2021
TEPCO to Develop Sample Tanks at Fukushima Daiichi to Prepare for Offshore Release of Treated Water
8 June, 2021
Opinions Differ Within Japan’s Governing Coalition Concerning Nuclear Power
8 June, 2021
Local Concerns About Unfounded Fears and Rumors on Offshore Release of Treated Water
7 June, 2021
JEMA Proposes that Nuclear Power Be Maintained at a Certain Scale
▲TOP