JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC.

for Japanese

ATOMS in JAPAN

12 December, 2017

JAEA Officially Classifies Monju Fast Reactor as “Closed Down”

On December 6, the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) filed an application with the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) for the approval of a decommissioning plan for the prototype fast breeder reactor (FBR) "Monju." The application is required under the Law for the Regulation of Nuclear Source Material, Nuclear Fuel Material and Reactors (the Reactor Regulation Law). As a result, the Monju reactor is now officially classified as "closed down."

Nuclear Safety Ceremony at Monju in 2005

Considering Monju’s peculiarities as a sodium-cooled reactor, the NRA has established a safety oversight team to follow JAEA’s activities. The decommissioning, to be completed over the course of some three decades, is divided into four phases. The immediate priority is to remove the fuel, which will be done during the first phase, to be completed by fiscal 2022 (April 2022 to March 2023).

The “Lonely” Reactor

Monju started construction in October 1985, with first criticality achieved in April 1994; it was connected to the power grid in August 1995. In December of that year, however, a sodium leakage occurred from piping in the secondary cooling system during test operations to confirm performance.

The accident had originally been classified as an “incident,” but a series of revelations and missteps soon drew the public’s ire: (1) a video showed the sodium reacting with air; (2) the public relations system at the Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation (PNC), the operator of Monju at the time, was antiquated and insensitive to public expectations; and (3) operational errors and design mistakes were publicized nationwide.

FBR MonjuThereafter, Monju remained shut down for an extended period. and its operator (PNC) went through a series of organizational restructurings, becoming the Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute (JNC) and eventually JAEA. In May 2010, JAEA resumed trial operations at Monju after fourteen years.

The long shutdown of the reactor, however, produced many adverse effects, with frequent occurrences of trivial problems. In August 2010, the so-called “in-vessel transfer machine” fell into the reactor vessel when it was being withdrawn after a scheduled fuel replacement, and could not initially be recovered. Eventual removal and restoration took two years, coming at tremendous cost.

There was additionally a series of omissions in safety inspections under operational safety programs, which generated another round of public anger.

Monju became “lost technology” in the sense, at least in part, that a generation of workers retiring during the long shutdown had left an insufficient number of staff members who were proficient in its operation. The other side of the coin was that inexperienced workers caused new problems, continuing the negative spiral, with another suspension following.

Monju was supposed to have been the core of Japan’s nuclear fuel cycle policy. Nevertheless, in December 2016, the Japanese government, the implementer of that policy, decided that the reactor would be decommissioned, with few objections from the domestic nuclear industry. Though Japan advocates a policy based on the nuclear fuel cycle, it has no means for implementing one. “Monju” was essentially abandoned.

Monju was believed to be an ideal reactor, “producing more fuel than it consumed.” Its life of nearly thirty-five years, however, was mostly a lonely one.

Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map

Video

“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, July 2019)

8 July, 2019
“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, July 2019)09:17

Recent News

23 January, 2020
Finishing Mission in Japan, IAEA’s IRRS Points Out Importance of NRA’s Communicating with Nuclear Industry
21 January, 2020
Evacuation Orders for Futaba, Okuma, Tomioka Towns to Be Partially Lifted in March, with JR Joban Line to Be Completely Reopened for Service
16 January, 2020
Japan’s Nuclear Power Plant Capacity Factor Stood at Just 21.4 Percent Last Year
26 December, 2019
IEEJ’s Supply-Demand Outlook for FY2020 Looks at Effect of Specific Safety Facility Installation Deadlines
25 December, 2019
ANRE Committee Clarifies Options for Treated Contaminated Water at Fukushima Daiichi NPPs, Viewing Both Offshore and Vapor Release Favorably
24 December, 2019
Fuel Removal from Fukushima Daiichi-1 NPP: Large Cover to be Installed First
18 December, 2019
JAEC Begins Hearing from University Personnel on Human Resource Development, Starting with Nagoya and Osaka Universities
13 December, 2019
NRA Approves Decommissioning Plans for Kansai EP’s Ohi-1 and-2
12 December, 2019
JAEA Holds International Forum on Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Nuclear Security
29 November, 2019
NRA Issues Draft Review Report: Onagawa-2 Meets New Regulatory Standards
▲TOP