JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC.

for Japanese

ATOMS in JAPAN

10 September, 2018

NRA Chairman Worried that Tritium Water Storage Would Complicate Fukushima Daiichi Decommissioning

At a regular press briefing on September 5, Toyoshi Fuketa, chairman of Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA), said that his opinion about the handling of tritium water stored in tanks at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plants was to “wait and see,” following two days of public hearings on the subject at the end of August. “Given that a precise process is proceeding,” he said, “we are waiting to make a judgment.”

Incidentally, the Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS)—the multi-nuclide removal equipment that purifies and treats contaminated water generated at the Fukushima Daiichi NPPs—cannot remove the tritium in the water, requiring another method.

The public hearings on the handling of the tritium water were conducted by a task force of experts from Japan’s Agency for Natural Resources and Energy (ANRE) on August 30 in Tomioka Town (Fukushima Prefecture), and on August 31 in Koriyama City (Fukushima Prefecture) and Tokyo.

A total of 44 people, including those in local fisheries, voiced their opinions at the hearings. Some were concerned about the damage caused by unfounded fears and rumors concerning the effects of the offshore disposal of tritium water. Meanwhile, many others thought that the water should remain stored in tanks for the time being while new treatment technologies were being sought.

Asked whether the tritium water should continue to be stored in the tanks, NRA Chairman Fuketa said,The answer changes depending on the time framework. Will it be just five or ten years? That might be one thing. Or will it be until another technological option becomes available? That would be something else. While it is fair not to exclude any possibilities, the implications for the decommissioning process increase the longer the issue remains unresolved.”

At a press briefing on August 29, prior to the public hearings, Fuketa had stated that the concentration control for the environmental release was set quite conservatively by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Science and Technology (MEXT) in its notification. He also said that no adverse effects on human health or food products were anticipated, insofar as those values were observed scientifically and technologically.

At the same time, he said that it was natural for people to feel psychological resistance to once-contaminated things, even after those things had been cleaned. He added that he recognized that people were concerned about unfounded fears and rumors, and that it was significant to pay heed to a broad range of people for their opinions.

Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map

Video

Fukushima Hydrogen Energy Research Field (FH2R)

9 August, 2018
Fukushima Hydrogen Energy Research Field (FH2R)01:38

Recent News

17 October, 2018
Shikoku Electric Power Asks Japan’s NRA to Approve Ikata-2 Decommissioning Plan
10 October, 2018
The Implications of Removing the “Sun Child” Statue in Fukushima
5 October, 2018
JAIF Press Briefing: President Takahashi Foresees Progress in BWR Examinations by NRA
28 September, 2018
NRA Approves Review Report Finding Tokai-2 NPP Compatible with New Regulatory Standards
28 September, 2018
Hiroshima High Court Rules to Allow Ikata-3 to Restart
26 September, 2018
Japanese Booth Holds Opening Ceremony at IAEA General Conference
20 September, 2018
62nd IAEA GC Opens: Japan’s Minister of State for Science Stresses National Policy of Reducing Plutonium Holdings
13 September, 2018
NRA Chairman Rebuts Idea that Hokkaido Blackouts Could Have Been Averted Had Tomari NPPs Been Restarted
12 September, 2018
JAEC Chairman Oka Give High Marks to the IAEA Joint Nuclear Energy Management School
10 September, 2018
NRA Chairman Worried that Tritium Water Storage Would Complicate Fukushima Daiichi Decommissioning
▲TOP