JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC.

for Japanese

ATOMS in JAPAN

1 August, 2019

NRA Deliberates Response by Takahama NPPs against Potential Tsunamis Caused by Underwater Landslides

At a regular meeting on July 10, Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) took up a report by the Kansai Electric Power Co. (Kansai EP) on what would happen if a tsunami caused by a submarine landslide hit its Takahama Nuclear Power Plants. The NRA had asked the company to reassess its response to “a tsunami for which an alarm may not be issued,” referring to tsunami produced by causes other than earthquakes.

Taking notice of a tsunami that occurred in the Sunda Strait in Indonesia on December 22, 2018, as a result of a volcanic eruption, the NRA has worked since January of this year on ascertaining the possible effects that a tsunami triggered by a submarine landslide in the Oki Trough might have on the Takahama NPPs.

All four units at the Takahama site have already cleared examinations confirming their compatibility with the new regulatory standards, and Units 3 and 4 have been restarted.

At a hearing last month, Kansai EP representatives explained to the NRA about its conclusion that—based on the observation of three tide gauges installed on the premises of the site—the closing of the tide gate on the water channel would negate any influences of a potential submarine landslide in the Oki Trough, either on Units 3 and 4, which are currently in operation, or on all four units when the two currently idled units resume service.

Specifically, a tsunami threat will be deemed to exist if the water levels indicated on at least two of the three tide gauges fall at least one meter in ten minutes, and subsequently rise more than one meter from the lowest level in another ten minutes. At that point, the power utility will respond by stopping the reactors and circulation pumps and closing the tide gate on the water channel.

At its previous regular meeting on July 3, the NRA noted that when all four units at the Takahama NPPs are in operation, a lowered water level due to backwash might affect the intake of the seawater pump. It thus expressed its view that Kansai EP should file an application for permission to change the reactor installation for the reactors.

On July 8, Kansai EP indicated it would file such applications in mid-September. At the meeting two days later, the company asked the NRA to clarify what back-fit system would be expected. Accordingly, another hearing will be held to share opinions.

Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map

Video

“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, July 2019)

8 July, 2019
“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, July 2019)09:17

Recent News

23 January, 2020
Finishing Mission in Japan, IAEA’s IRRS Points Out Importance of NRA’s Communicating with Nuclear Industry
21 January, 2020
Evacuation Orders for Futaba, Okuma, Tomioka Towns to Be Partially Lifted in March, with JR Joban Line to Be Completely Reopened for Service
16 January, 2020
Japan’s Nuclear Power Plant Capacity Factor Stood at Just 21.4 Percent Last Year
26 December, 2019
IEEJ’s Supply-Demand Outlook for FY2020 Looks at Effect of Specific Safety Facility Installation Deadlines
25 December, 2019
ANRE Committee Clarifies Options for Treated Contaminated Water at Fukushima Daiichi NPPs, Viewing Both Offshore and Vapor Release Favorably
24 December, 2019
Fuel Removal from Fukushima Daiichi-1 NPP: Large Cover to be Installed First
18 December, 2019
JAEC Begins Hearing from University Personnel on Human Resource Development, Starting with Nagoya and Osaka Universities
13 December, 2019
NRA Approves Decommissioning Plans for Kansai EP’s Ohi-1 and-2
12 December, 2019
JAEA Holds International Forum on Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Nuclear Security
29 November, 2019
NRA Issues Draft Review Report: Onagawa-2 Meets New Regulatory Standards
▲TOP