JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC.

for Japanese

ATOMS in JAPAN

10 July, 2015

NRA Hears from Power Companies on BWR Countermeasures

At a meeting on July 9, Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) heard from the Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), the Chubu Electric Power Co., and two other power companies about how far they have come along in developing measures to deal with the new regulatory standards for boiling water reactors (BWRs), the same type of reactor as that used in TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, damaged severely in the March 2011 tsunami.

TEPCO's Kashiwazaki Kariwa NPPs

The NRA will next select which BWR plants should be given priority in the examination. However, it will be restricted to examining facilities, including reactor buildings, as there is no sign yet when it will finish examining standard ground motion (Ss), the basis for seismic design.

The NRA has already finished joint examinations for BWRs whose applications had been filed early, checking on common matters. Those reactors are listed below:

  • Onagawa-2 (BWR, 825MWe), owned and operated by the Tohoku Electric Power Co. in Miyagi Prefecture (northern Honshu).
  • Kashiwazaki-Kariwa-6 and -7 (ABWRs, 1356MWe each), owned and operated by TEPCO in Niigata Prefecture (Sea of Japan coast, northern Honshu).
  • Hamaoka-4 (BWR, 1137MWe), owned and operated by the Chubu Electric Power Co. in Shizuoka Prefecture (central Honshu).
  • Shimane-2 (BWR, 820MWe), owned and operated by the Chugoku Electric Power Co. in Shimane Prefecture (western Honshu).

The NRA will next decide which plants to examine first, after reconfirming how long it will take for the power companies to respond on such major issues as measures to prevent severe accidents, including damage to nuclear containment vessels and reactor cores.

Sendai-1 and -2, owned and operated by the Kyushu Electric Power Co. in Kagoshima Prefecture (southern Kyushu), and the Takahama-3 and -4, owned and operated by the Kansai Electric Power Co. in Fukui Prefecture (Sea of Japan coast, central Honshu) have already cleared NRA examinations, but each of them is a pressurized water reactor (PWR). No BWR has received clearance as yet.

In the case of those PWRs, the NRA similarly placed priority on examining Sendai-1 and -2 so that it could apply the results in other PWRs.

Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map

Video

“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, July 2019)

8 July, 2019
“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, July 2019)09:17

Recent News

21 January, 2020
Evacuation Orders for Futaba, Okuma, Tomioka Towns to Be Partially Lifted in March, with JR Joban Line to Be Completely Reopened for Service
16 January, 2020
Japan’s Nuclear Power Plant Capacity Factor Stood at Just 21.4 Percent Last Year
26 December, 2019
IEEJ’s Supply-Demand Outlook for FY2020 Looks at Effect of Specific Safety Facility Installation Deadlines
25 December, 2019
ANRE Committee Clarifies Options for Treated Contaminated Water at Fukushima Daiichi NPPs, Viewing Both Offshore and Vapor Release Favorably
24 December, 2019
Fuel Removal from Fukushima Daiichi-1 NPP: Large Cover to be Installed First
18 December, 2019
JAEC Begins Hearing from University Personnel on Human Resource Development, Starting with Nagoya and Osaka Universities
13 December, 2019
NRA Approves Decommissioning Plans for Kansai EP’s Ohi-1 and-2
12 December, 2019
JAEA Holds International Forum on Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Nuclear Security
29 November, 2019
NRA Issues Draft Review Report: Onagawa-2 Meets New Regulatory Standards
28 November, 2019
RIKEN Unveils Transportable Compact Neutron Source System
▲TOP