for Japanese


25 January, 2016

Nuclear Liability Committee Discusses Scope of Responsibility and Operator Foreseeability

On January 20, a meeting was held in Tokyo of the special committee on the nuclear damage compensation system under the Japan Atomic Energy Commission (JAEC). The members discussed such matters as strict legal liability and the channeling of liability, along with the scope of responsibility and financial security, as parts of an ideal system of nuclear damage compensation.

They continued discussions of the previous meeting concerning the division of responsibility between the public and private sectors. Professor Shigeru Takahashi of the Hitotsubashi University Graduate School of Law said that it was unreasonable to incorporate such a division in general laws, as the locus of responsibility depends on the facts and circumstances of each particular incident. He added that it was thus more appropriate for the government to determine the responsibility case by case, and also said that it was important for the system to enable relief to be provided to disaster victims evenly.

Another committee member, Toshihiko Baba of the Central Union of Agricultural Cooperatives, said that the government should come to the forefront and verify a mechanism to respond to victims’ needs promptly, citing the inordinate time taken for people to get compensated after the March 2011 accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plants. The reason, he said, was that it is not always clear who is responsible when an accident occurs.

As for strict legal liability and the channeling of liability, committee members mostly thought it appropriate not to apply the Product Liability Law. As for the scope of liability, Executive Director Yuka Matayoshi of Morgan Stanley MUFG Securities Co., Ltd. said that it was important to discuss such issues considering changes stemming from the deregulation of Japan’s retail electricity market, as well as looking at overseas examples. She then cautioned that while everyone was mindful of the importance of responding flexibly, it could also make things less foreseeable for nuclear operators.

Regarding concerns that limited liability may lead to a safety “moral hazard”—referring to people’s tendency to loosen vigilance in such situations—Professor Hiroshi Ohashi of the Graduate School of Economics at the University of Tokyo pointed out that there was already an “institutional brake” in the case of nuclear power: namely, the process involving regulatory standards and approvals from municipalities.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map


Voices from Nuclear Industry – Contributing to a clean and resilient recovery

3 September, 2020
Voices from Nuclear Industry – Contributing to a clean and resilient recovery03:59

Recent News

23 September, 2020
Hitachi to End Business Operations on UK Nuclear Power Project
15 September, 2020
Japan’s Cabinet Office to Hold Virtual Side Event on Radiation Cancer Therapy at IAEA General Conference
10 September, 2020
New Report Released on Nuclear Power’s Role in Dealing with Environment Issues
4 September, 2020
Japan’s NRA Says RFS’s Recyclable-Fuel Storage Center Is Compatible with Regulatory Standards
3 September, 2020
JAIF Issues Joint Video Message with Foreign Counterparts
27 August, 2020
METI Minister Kajiyama Stresses Importance of Realizing HLW Final Disposal
7 August, 2020
Nuclear Powered Ship Mutsu Designated as Special “Ship Heritage”
3 August, 2020
On Taking Office as JAIF President
3 August, 2020
Nuclear Energy Buyers Guide in Japan 2020-21 is now available
31 July, 2020
Thoughts on the Decision to Approve Changes to the Reprocessing Business