JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC.

for Japanese

ATOMS in JAPAN

16 March, 2015

Professor Advises JAEC on Japan’s Approaches to Nuclear Accidents

On March 10, at a meeting of the Japan Atomic Energy Commission (JAEC), Professor Kiyoshi Kurokawa of the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies gave a presentation on his basic thinking toward the approaches the nation should take toward nuclear accidents.

The professor, who served as chairman of the National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (NAIIC), said that it was common for technologically advanced countries to establish an independent investigative committee whenever a major accident occurs. For that reason, other countries reported with surprise that NAIIC’s establishment was the first ever such instance of such an organization in Japan’s history of constitutional government. He pointed out that Japan was quite unusual in that regard.

While Japanese science and technology, engineering, and industrial production have earned global confidence, he said, the images of the nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station instantly conveyed the country’s fragility to the world. He critically noted that although people had called for a review of safety measures against tsunamis before the accident, no action was ever taken, on the continued assumption that no accident would occur.

The professor cited several direct causes of the Fukushima Daiichi accident, as follows:

  • Insufficient “Defense in Depth”.
  • No mechanisms to reflect and incorporate knowledge and past experience.
  • Lack of awareness of safety and necessary safety measures.
  • A situation in which the regulators, including academia and scientists, had become “captive” to the regulated (plant operators and so forth).

As for the root causes of the accident, he pointed out the following problems:

  • Lack of an attitude of learning and questioning in a quest for higher safety standards.
  • Absence of a safety culture.
  • A self-righteous mindset among nuclear-related parties.
  • An exclusive, homogeneous organizational culture.

He then introduced illustrated videos from a website (http://naiic.net/en/) entitled “The Simplest Explanation of The National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission Report,” in which students and others explained matters related to Fukushima Daiichi, as part of their effort to understand it better.

Japan’s responsibility to the world, Professor Kurokawa said, and what the world expects from Japan, included the following items:

  • Facing up to the causes of the accident.
  • Proceeding with decommissioning.
  • Resolving contaminated water issues.
  • Engaging in open, effective, and two-way communication with other countries’ nuclear regulatory authorities and administrations in regard to Japan’s desired regulatory organization, and other matters.
  • Sincerely reflecting on responses to the accident to jointly develop a model case for the future with the rest of the world.

The professor underscored the importance of an attitude of cooperation with the world toward the restoration of confidence in nuclear energy. He said that it must include the introduction of independence, global recognition and technological objectivity into the country’s nuclear-related administrative processes.

Moreover, he stressed that it must also include transparency, both domestically and internationally, such as sharing in the process of striving to set world-level regulatory standards in collaboration with other countries’ regulatory bodies.

As for personnel exchanges and the fostering of specialists, he said that Japanese specialists should leave the country for three years or so to get experience elsewhere and learn from other countries, in addition to having foreign specialists come to Japan.

In his conclusion, Professor Kurokawa enthusiastically encouraged the listeners by saying that the role of JAEC was important and that the world had high expectations for it.

Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map

Video

Grossi on Fukushima: Marking a Decade Since the Accident

10 March, 2021
Grossi on Fukushima: Marking a Decade Since the Accident04:11

Recent News

17 September, 2021
NRA Permits Shimane-2 under New Regulatory Standards
14 September, 2021
IAEA Deputy Director General Evrard Visits Japan in Advance of Safety Review of ALPS-treated Water
1 September, 2021
Evaluation Report Issued by IAEA’s Review Mission to Fukushima Daiichi: First Visit since 2018
24 August, 2021
METI and IAEA Agree on Further Review Missions to Fukushima Daiichi
4 August, 2021
JAEA Restarts High-Temperature Engineering Test Reactor “HTTR”
2 August, 2021
Information about Fukushima Daiichi NPS Water Treatment
28 July, 2021
METI’s Committee Shows Rough Draft of Next Strategic Energy Plan
2 July, 2021
Mihama-3 Restarted After Decade-long Hiatus: First Restart in Japan of a Reactor Operating Beyond 40 Years
28 June, 2021
Mihama-3 Restarts after Decade-long Hiatus
25 June, 2021
New Canada-Japan Partnership Supports Greater Collaboration to Meet Climate Change Objectives and Net-zero Goals
24 June, 2021
METI Issues New Green Growth Strategy Through Achieving Carbon Neutrality
16 June, 2021
ANRE Sticks to “S+3E”
16 June, 2021
Japanese Cabinet Approves Environmental White Paper 2021
16 June, 2021
LDP Parliamentary Association to Reconfirm Position on Utilization of Nuclear Power
16 June, 2021
Fukui Governor Concerned about Deletion of Reference to “Maximum Utilization” of Nuclear Power
14 June, 2021
Working Group on Offshore Release of Treated Water Meets in Miyagi
14 June, 2021
NRA Considers Policy on Treating Slurry from ALPS, with Local Understanding Essential
11 June, 2021
Japanese Cabinet Approves Energy White Paper 2021
11 June, 2021
Government Omits Description of “Maximum Utilization” of Nuclear Power
9 June, 2021
MNF Hopes to Resume Fuel Production as Early as November
▲TOP