for Japanese


10 August, 2016

Report Completed on Criteria for Scientifically Promising HLW Disposal Sites

On August 9, a report was completed and released by a technical working group under Japan's Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy that is reevaluating technology for the geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste (HLW). The report summarized deliberations on requirements and standards for scientifically promising sites for the waste, for which the Japanese government wants to identify multiple candidates by the end of the year.

The group discussed various aspects dealing with the requirements and standards for identifying scientifically promising sites, all from a geoscientific perspective, as follows: (a) the geological environment and its long-term stability, (b) the safety of buildings and operating facilities below and above ground, (c) the ability to ensure safety during the transportation of the waste, and (d) the viability of a business operated there. An interim report was drawn up at the end of last year.

When completing its report, the group also took into consideration an international peer review by the OECD/NEA in May of this year, as well as opinions and comments from relevant academic societies and other bodies.

Scientifically promising sites are defined as those highly likely to be confirmed as suitable for construction of final disposal facilities in the future. Such determination occurs in a step preliminary to the process of investigation for the selection of disposal sites based on scientific knowledge.

The group’s report this time classified various sites into three groups according to their suitability—nominally suitable, suitable, and highly suitable—giving explanations for each.

Visiting Japan in May, the OECD/NEA peer review team conducted an external evaluation of matters to be considered and appropriate steps when presenting scientifically promising sites. Its final report concluded with three points:

  1. The stepwise site selection process is consistent with international practices.
  2.  The approach to ensure an informed and willing host in each step of the site selection process is consistent with international practices.
  3.  It is important to initiate open dialogue in the early phases.

Based on that, the recent report modified the interim report of the end of last year to include detailed and clear explanations of terminology related to the classification of scientifically promising sites.

One member of the working group noted that while people across Japan are increasingly interested in scientifically promising sites, the phrase “promising site” as heard in the media might cause misunderstanding, namely, the belief that a presentation of a certain site in that fashion could directly lead to its selection as the final disposal site.

The report will be finalized after it has been opened for public comments. It should then contribute to the mapping of scientifically promising sites across Japan.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map


Grossi on Fukushima: Marking a Decade Since the Accident

10 March, 2021
Grossi on Fukushima: Marking a Decade Since the Accident04:11

Recent News

16 June, 2021
ANRE Sticks to “S+3E”
16 June, 2021
Japanese Cabinet Approves Environmental White Paper 2021
16 June, 2021
LDP Parliamentary Association to Reconfirm Position on Utilization of Nuclear Power
16 June, 2021
Fukui Governor Concerned about Deletion of Reference to “Maximum Utilization” of Nuclear Power
14 June, 2021
Working Group on Offshore Release of Treated Water Meets in Miyagi
14 June, 2021
NRA Considers Policy on Treating Slurry from ALPS, with Local Understanding Essential
11 June, 2021
Japanese Cabinet Approves Energy White Paper 2021
11 June, 2021
Government Omits Description of “Maximum Utilization” of Nuclear Power
9 June, 2021
MNF Hopes to Resume Fuel Production as Early as November
8 June, 2021
TEPCO to Develop Sample Tanks at Fukushima Daiichi to Prepare for Offshore Release of Treated Water
8 June, 2021
Opinions Differ Within Japan’s Governing Coalition Concerning Nuclear Power
8 June, 2021
Local Concerns About Unfounded Fears and Rumors on Offshore Release of Treated Water
7 June, 2021
JEMA Proposes that Nuclear Power Be Maintained at a Certain Scale
7 June, 2021
IHI to Participate in NuScale’s SMR Project
4 June, 2021
FEPC Declares for “Zero Emissions”
4 June, 2021
Support Grows Within LDP for Nuclear Power
2 June, 2021
JAIF Reports to JAEC on JAIF Annual Conference
2 June, 2021
Japan’s Power Industry Workers Union Calls for Prudence toward the Closure of Coal-fired Power Plants
2 June, 2021
Japan’s Advisory Committee Discusses Supply-and-Demand Measures in Summer and Winter 2021
1 June, 2021
Preparations Continue Toward Restarting Tokai-2 NPP