for Japanese


13 April, 2015

Three Methods Proposed for Removing Fuel Debris in Fukushima Daiichi Decommissioning

At a meeting of the decommissioning and contaminated-water council held in Fukushima Prefecture on April 9, Japan’s Nuclear Damage Compensation and Decommissioning Facilitation Corp. (NDF) explained a draft technological strategic plan toward the eventual decommissioning of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. The meeting was attended by representatives of local municipalities and commercial and industrial organizations.

Since the NDF was reorganized in August 2014 — when it was given additional decommissioning-related responsibilities — its decommissioning technical committee has been considering various methods, processes and priorities in a strategic plan and action plans in three areas: (1) the removal of fuel debris, (2) waste measures, and (3) stopping flows of water into reactor buildings.

Those will be reflected in revisions to the government’s medium-term and long-term roadmap towards the decommissioning of Fukushima Daiichi Units 1-4.

Focusing on the five basic concepts of safety, certainty, rationality, swiftness and on-site practicality in reducing risk, the draft strategic plan covers removal of fuel debris and waste measures.

In its decommissioning of Fukushima Daiichi, the Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) will need to continue efforts to reduce risks to people and the environment from radioactive materials resulting from the severe accident of March 2011.

In the plan, several major sources of risk have been identified at the site, including contaminated water, fuel stored in the spent fuel pools, fuel debris in the reactor containment vessels, and secondary waste generated by water treatment.

Risk assessments are then done for all sources of risk, with priorities being assigned, and a risk reduction strategy is presented toward issuance of policies to deal with them.

TEPCO will attempt three methods to remove the fuel debris in the following order:

  • Water-covered, with removal of fuel debris from the upper part of the containment vessel (CV)
  • Uncovered with removal from the upper part of the CV
  • Uncovered with removal from the side of the CV

In the first method, TEPCO will fill the CV with water and remove the fuel debris in the water. The advantages of this method include cooling of the fuel debris, radiation shielding, and prevention of radioactive dust from scattering. Potential issues, on the other hand, include keeping the water within the CV, as well as seismic safety and control of criticality.

Meanwhile, in the two uncovered methods, debris is to be removed either from the top or the side (on the 1st floor of the reactor building) — both are options if filling the CV with water proves to be impossible. Potential issues include the scattering of radioactive dust and a lack of radiation shielding.

As for measures to control waste, the power company plans to reduce its volume by thoroughly controlling the amount brought into the Fukushima Daiichi site, and by the reuse of the waste there. Additionally, it will scrutinize the generation of secondary waste.

In its management of storage, TEPCO will use limited premises more efficiently and deal with the waste systematically based on its predicted generation from the decommissioning work.

In addition, at the April 9 council meeting, TEPCO reported on the status of comprehensive inspections for risks that may affect areas beyond the Fukushima Daiichi premises. The power company has been conducting them since contaminated water started leaking to the sea through drainage channels.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SNS facebooktwitter

NPPs Map


“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, July 2019)

8 July, 2019
“The current situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPS” -From 3.11 toward the future- (ver, July 2019)09:17

Recent News

23 January, 2020
Finishing Mission in Japan, IAEA’s IRRS Points Out Importance of NRA’s Communicating with Nuclear Industry
21 January, 2020
Evacuation Orders for Futaba, Okuma, Tomioka Towns to Be Partially Lifted in March, with JR Joban Line to Be Completely Reopened for Service
16 January, 2020
Japan’s Nuclear Power Plant Capacity Factor Stood at Just 21.4 Percent Last Year
26 December, 2019
IEEJ’s Supply-Demand Outlook for FY2020 Looks at Effect of Specific Safety Facility Installation Deadlines
25 December, 2019
ANRE Committee Clarifies Options for Treated Contaminated Water at Fukushima Daiichi NPPs, Viewing Both Offshore and Vapor Release Favorably
24 December, 2019
Fuel Removal from Fukushima Daiichi-1 NPP: Large Cover to be Installed First
18 December, 2019
JAEC Begins Hearing from University Personnel on Human Resource Development, Starting with Nagoya and Osaka Universities
13 December, 2019
NRA Approves Decommissioning Plans for Kansai EP’s Ohi-1 and-2
12 December, 2019
JAEA Holds International Forum on Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Nuclear Security
29 November, 2019
NRA Issues Draft Review Report: Onagawa-2 Meets New Regulatory Standards